I've read Merleau-Ponty's commentary on Husserl's phenomenology and want to see how well I can explain it without looking at it.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat would you like to see happen in this conversation?
/nishio/human.iconI've read Merleau-Ponty's commentary on Husserl's phenomenology and want to see how well I can explain it without looking at it.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat kind of "hussar" is this "hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconA philosopher famous for his phenomenology, who, according to Merleau-Ponty, introduced the discussion of language, which was not so mainstream in the philosophical genealogy.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat kind of "Merlot Ponti" is this "Merlot Ponti"?
/nishio/human.iconMerleau-Ponty is also famous for his philosophy on language, the contrast between institutionalized language and the language that is being born.
/nishio/kei.iconIs there anything else you can tell us about this "Merlo Ponti"?
/nishio/human.iconNow I want to talk about Hussar.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is it that you value?
/nishio/human.iconI would like to verify the extent of my understanding of Husserl by answering the question.
/nishio/kei.iconIs there anything else you can tell us about this "hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconEarly on, I was interested in the unifying nature of language, but later I came to believe that language becomes a unified system when people try to use it to express themselves.
/nishio/kei.icon
Merleau-Ponty is also famous for his philosophy about language, the contrast between institutionalized language and the language that is being born.
Where is this "Merlo Ponti" located?
/nishio/human.icon👎 Merlo Ponti
/nishio/kei.icon
I would like to verify how well I understand Husserl by answering the question.
How do you know this "hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconI read the commentary.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat kind of "read" is that "read"?
/nishio/human.iconI chopped and arrayed them in Kozaneba, this as an experiment in assisting the process of reading.
/nishio/kei.icon
I would like to verify how well I understand Husserl by answering the question.
What do you hope will happen regarding this "hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconI hope that now that I know a lot about Husserl, I'll read Heidegger next.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat needs to happen to the "hussar" for that to happen?
/nishio/human.iconHussar will never change, so I hope I can answer your questions.
/nishio/kei.iconAs for "hussar," can it be done?
/nishio/human.iconI'd like to do a test to see if I can answer that question.
/nishio/kei.icon
Hussar will never change, so hopefully I can answer your question.
Where is this "hussar" located?
/nishio/human.iconListen first.
/nishio/kei.iconYes, sir.
/nishio/human.iconLet's see, if we consider that language is the accidental result of various past events, it is incomprehensible that it should be a unified system of meaning, it would be chaos!
/nishio/kei.iconHussar."
/nishio/human.iconAnd so, instead, we approach a unified system by trying to express what people want to say about themselves.
/nishio/kei.iconHussar."
/nishio/human.iconWell, I can't explain it anymore, I don't understand much.
/nishio/kei.iconHussar."
/nishio/human.iconthe end
/nishio/kei.iconWhat would you like to see happen in this conversation?
/nishio/human.iconI wanted to verify how much I understood, but it was still hard to explain without seeing anything.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat kind of "verify" is that "verify"?
/nishio/human.iconIf you understand enough, the words will come out, if not, you don't understand yet.
/nishio/kei.icon
Hussar will never change, so hopefully I can answer your question.
Where is this "hussar" located?
/nishio/human.iconThat's before Merleau-Ponty.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is it that you value?
/nishio/human.iconYou're talking about why I'm trying to understand Husserl, because Eugene Gendlin's ideas were very much in line with my practical purpose, which was to focus on how to put the unverbalized into language, so I was studying that, and I was studying the Merleau-Ponty text that he was introducing me to. I ordered and read the Merleau-Ponty text that he was referring to, and it was a commentary on Husserl and then a development of Husserl's commentary, so I decided to experiment with that as a test bed and try to use Kozaneba to go through the process of reading and understanding a difficult book.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat does that "hussar" look like?
/nishio/human.iconIt's a source, I don't know if it's useful per se, Eugene Gendlin and Merleau-Ponty both developed a lot of things based on Husserl's story, so it would be good to know where it's Husserl-derived.
/nishio/kei.iconWhere does this "hussar" come from?
/nishio/human.iconI was interested in it because Eugene Gendlin introduced it, and I originally went through my "phenomenology" thinking "hmm, I don't know, it doesn't seem useful for my life", but I'm finding out that it's actually quite relevant in regards to my current interests.
/nishio/kei.icon
You're asking why I'm trying to understand Husserl, because Eugene Gendlin's ideas were very much in line with my practical purpose, which was to focus on how to put the unverbalized into language, so I was studying that, and he was introducing me to Merleau-Ponty's writing. I ordered and read the Merleau-Ponty text that he was referring to, and it was a commentary on Husserl and then a development of Husserl's commentary, so I decided to experiment with that as a test bed and try to use Kozaneba to go through the process of reading and understanding a difficult book.
What "language" is this "language"?
/nishio/human.iconLanguage used as a means of expressing what you want to express
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is the relationship between its "language" and "hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconHusserl paid a lot of attention to language, rather philosophy is the beneficiary of language.
/nishio/kei.iconIs that "language" the same as "Hussar"? Is it different?
/nishio/human.iconnot match the correct (answer, etc.)
/nishio/kei.icon
Husserl paid a lot of attention to language, rather philosophy is the beneficiary of language
Is there anything else you can tell us about this "language"?
/nishio/human.iconLanguage Encompassing Philosophy?
/nishio/kei.iconWhat happens to the "hussar" when its "language"?
/nishio/human.iconThe philosophy he does is itself done using language, a process that Merleau-Ponty argues should be repeated
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is the connection between its "language" and "hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconUmmm, I don't know.
/nishio/kei.icon
The philosophy he does is itself done using language, a process that Merleau-Ponty argues should be repeated
Where can I find this "Merlo Ponti"?
/nishio/human.iconBetween Hussar and Eugene Gendlin
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is the relationship between this "Eugene Gendlin" and "Hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconSo Eugene Gendlin himself tried to formalize philosophically the concepts that Carl Rogers was using practically, and then he realized that half of it was phenomenology, and he put one foot in Husserl!
/nishio/kei.iconIs that "Eugene Gendlin" the same as "Hussar"? Is it different?
/nishio/human.iconnot match the correct (answer, etc.)
/nishio/kei.icon
The philosophy he does is itself done using language, a process that Merleau-Ponty argues should be repeated
How do you know this "Merlo Ponti"?
/nishio/human.iconMaybe you should read the rest of the article and figure out Merleau-Ponty's argument.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is the relationship between this "Merleau-Ponty" and "Hussar"?
/nishio/human.iconYes, so far I don't see the difference between Merleau-Ponty's and Husserl's arguments, I don't think they are equal, but what is the difference?
/nishio/kei.iconIs that "Merleau-Ponty" the same as "Hussar"? Is it the same as "Merleau-Ponty"?
/nishio/human.iconThey should be different, but I can't tell the difference right now.
/nishio/kei.icon
Yes, so far I don't see the difference between Merleau-Ponty's and Husserl's arguments, I don't think they are equal, but what is the difference?
Where does this "Merlo Ponti" come from?
/nishio/human.iconHow did I know that? The engineer's intellectual production techniques mentioned it.
/nishio/kei.icon
Yes, so far I don't see the difference between Merleau-Ponty's and Husserl's arguments, I don't think they are equal, but what is the difference?
What does this "Merlo Ponti" look like?
/nishio/human.iconI don't know.
/nishio/kei.icon
The philosophy he does is itself done using language, a process that Merleau-Ponty argues should be repeated
Where is this "language" located?
---